- Visual studio 2008 install moq verification#
- Visual studio 2008 install moq code#
- Visual studio 2008 install moq download#
- Visual studio 2008 install moq windows#
Visual studio 2008 install moq windows#
The C run-time library always prefixes identifiers that are not part of the C++ standard with underscores, while the Windows team does not do this. By default, when you create a new C++ project in Visual Studio, _UNICODE is defined (just like UNICODE is defined). If _UNICODE is defined, it expands to wcslen otherwise, it expands to strlen. Now, in your code, you should call _tcslen.
Visual studio 2008 install moq code#
To write source code that can be compiled for either ANSI or Unicode, you must also include TChar.h, which defines the following macro: #ifdef _UNICODE And, of course, the Unicode versions do the work themselves too they do not internally call the ANSI versions.Īn example of a C run-time function that returns the length of an ANSI string is strlen, and an example of an equivalent C run-time function that returns the length of a Unicode string is wcslen.īoth of these functions are prototyped in String.h. However, unlike Windows, the ANSI functions do the work they do not translate the strings to Unicode and then call the Unicode version of the functions internally. Like the Windows functions, the C run-time library offers one set of functions to manipulate ANSI characters and strings and another set of functions to manipulate Unicode characters and strings. I probably reference both in my project.įrom the book Windows via C/C++ Unicode and ANSI Functions in the C Run-Time Library Personally, I don’t see moq provides much more than Rhino Mocks. You can find a lot of interesting discussion from the evolving history of moq. I find it very interesting to read the history of moq from its designer kzu, he created the framework initially because he is not satisfied with the other existing frameworks, however, he has to add a lot of other features into his framework such as VerifyAll. A mockist TDDer “will always use a mock for any object with interesting behavior.” According to Fowler, the “classical TDD style is to use real objects if possible and a double if it's awkward to use the real thing.” A mockist TDDer, on the other hand, almost always uses mocks and behavior verification. A classical TDDer tends to use stubs and state verification. This final distinction concerns the “philosophy to the way testing and design play together”. For example, you want to know whether a not a certain method was called on one mock object after a method was called on another mock object.įowler makes a final distinction between classical TDD and mockist TDD. When performing behavior verification, you are interested in how the mock objects interact. Mocks, on the other hand, are most often used when performing behavior verification. When performing state verification, you are interested in determining whether a certain condition is true or false at the end of a test. Stubs are most often used when performing state verification.
Visual studio 2008 install moq verification#
This distinction between stubs and mocks leads Fowler to distinguish between state verification and behavior verification. According to Fowler - who uses Meszaros’ definitions here – stubs “provide canned answers to calls made during the test, usually not responding at all to anything outside what's programmed in for the test.” Mocks, on the other hand, are “objects pre-programmed with expectations which form a specification of the calls they are expected to receive”.
First, he distinguishes a stub from a mock. In this paper, Fowler makes several distinctions. His summary of the previous article is insightful. Stephen Walther wrote a very good article here, and he provided a lot of background information regarding the Moq framework. I belong to the classic testers in his definitions.
Martin Fowler wrote a very good article on this topic.
Visual studio 2008 install moq download#
If you download the Northwind example from here, you will find the example uses the moq framework. I started to look into the Asp.Net mvc framework lately and think it’s good opportunity to look into those frameworks because Asp.Net will definitely give those frameworks a push. Unfortunately, most of my projects are not designed this way, so I have to manually setup those stubs. To effectively use those mock frameworks such as Rhino.Mocks and moq, you have to write your code in a TDD/BDD friendly way. I have been reading some blog posts, but didn’t spend too much time digging into those frameworks too much. I have been using NUnit/MbUnit/VSTest to develop my tests for a while, but I don’t use mock frameworks too much.